Any individual who is lawfully in charge or occupation of any premises and who reasonably suspects that stolen stock or produce, as defined in any law regarding the theft of stock or produce, is on or within the premises concerned or that any article has been placed thereon or therein or is within the custody or possession of any person upon or in such premises in contravention of any regulation referring to intoxicating liquor, dependence-producing drugs, arms, and ammunition or explosives, might at any time, if a police officer shouldn’t be readily available, enter such premises to search such premises and any particular person thereon or therein. If any such inventory, produce, or article is discovered, he shall take possession thereof and deliver it to a police official.
Where a police officer in the investigation of an offense or alleged offense reasonably suspects that a person who could furnish info concerning any such violation is on any premises, such police official may, without a warrant, enter such premises to interrogate such individual and obtain a statement from him: Offered that such police officer shall not enter any non-public dwelling without the consent of the occupier thereof. A search warrant may be issued on any day and shall be under pressure till it is executed or is canceled by the one that gave it or, if such a person isn’t out there, by a person with like authority. If no criminal proceedings are instituted about any article referred to in section 30c or if it appears that such report is not required on trial for functions of proof or purposes of an order of court docket, the article shall be returned to the person from whom it was seized, if a such individual could lawfully possess such report, or, if a such individual could not legally have a such article, to the person who could honestly keep it.
A warrant under subsection 1 may be issued on any day. It shall be of force until it’s executed or is canceled by the person who gave it or, if such individual isn’t out there, by a person with like authority. 2 The place any individual falsely offers information on oath under part 211 or 251 and a search warrant or, as the case could also be, a contract is issued and executed on such info. Such a person is, in consequence of such false information, convicted of perjury, the courtroom convicting such individual might, upon the application of anyone that has suffered an injury as a result of the unlawful entry, search, or seizure, as the 77betsg case could also be, or upon the appliance of the prosecutor performing on the instructions of that individual, award compensation in respect of such damage, after that the provisions of section 300 shall mutatis mutandis apply concerning the such award.